[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141105.121622.1937064439841390520.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:16:22 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Ian.Campbell@...rix.com
Cc: david.vrabel@...rix.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, wei.liu2@...rix.com,
malcolm.crossley@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: remove unconditional
pull_skb_tail in guest Tx path
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:53:05 +0000
> I'd like to see the commit message expanded to explain why this isn't
> introducing a (security) bug by not pulling enough stuff into the header
> (IOW the conclusion of the discussion).
Just because a fundamental aspect of how we handle packets isn't clear
to some people, doesn't mean that every commit that depends upon that
invariant has to explain it in the commit message. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists