lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545A692E.40002@hartkopp.net>
Date:	Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:15:10 +0100
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
CC:	wg@...ndegger.com, varkabhadram@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: M_CAN message RAM initialization AppNote  - was: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3]
 can: m_can: workaround for transmit data less than 4 bytes

Hi all,

just to close this application note relevant point ...

I got an answer from Florian Hartwich (Mr. CAN) from Bosch regarding the bit 
error detection found by Dong Aisheng.

The relevant interrupts IR.BEU or IR.BEC monitor the message RAM:

Bit 21 BEU: Bit Error Uncorrected
Message RAM bit error detected, uncorrected. Controlled by input signal 
m_can_aeim_berr[1] generated by an optional external parity / ECC logic 
attached to the Message RAM. An uncorrected Message RAM bit error sets 
CCCR.INIT to ‘1’. This is done to avoid transmission of corrupted data.

0= No bit error detected when reading from Message RAM
1= Bit error detected, uncorrected (e.g. parity logic)

Bit 20 BEC: Bit Error Corrected
Message RAM bit error detected and corrected. Controlled by input signal 
m_can_aeim_berr[0] generated by an optional external parity / ECC logic 
attached to the Message RAM.

0= No bit error detected when reading from Message RAM
1= Bit error detected and corrected (e.g. ECC)

---

The Message RAM is usually equipped with a parity or ECC functionality.
But RAM cells suffer a hardware reset and can therefore hold arbitrary content 
at startup - including parity and/or ECC bits.

So when you write only the CAN ID and the first four bytes the last four bytes 
remain untouched. Then the M_CAN starts to read in 32bit words from the start 
of the Tx Message element. So it is very likely to trigger the message RAM 
error when reading the uninitialized 32bit word from the last four bytes.

Finally it turns out that an initial writing (with any kind of data) to the 
entire message RAM is mandatory to create valid parity/ECC checksums.

That's it.

Regards,
Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ