[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5459FFEA.3000101@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 11:46:02 +0100
From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@...csson.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Possible bug in net/core/neighbor.c
I find the following in "net/core/neighbor.c"
/* Compare new lladdr with cached one */
if (!dev->addr_len) {
/* First case: device needs no address. */
lladdr = neigh->ha;
} else if (lladdr) {
/* The second case: if something is already cached
and a new address is proposed:
- compare new & old
- if they are different, check override flag
*/
/* POSSIBLE BUG */
if ((old & NUD_VALID) &&
!memcmp(lladdr, neigh->ha, dev->addr_len))
lladdr = neigh->ha;
/* END POSSIBLE BUG */
} else {
/* No address is supplied; if we know something,
use it, otherwise discard the request.
*/
err = -EINVAL;
if (!(old & NUD_VALID))
goto out;
lladdr = neigh->ha;
}
It looks to me like the code is saying
if the proposed address is equal to the original address,
set the proposed address to the original address.
which is pretty meaningless.
Should it not be:
if ((old & NUD_VALID) &&
memcmp(lladdr, neigh->ha, dev->addr_len)) /* True if
addresses are not equal */
neigh->ha = lladdr; /* Update to new address */
If not, I would appreciate an explanation what the code is doing.
--
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists