[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545A1369.2040309@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:09:13 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, lw1a2.jing@...il.com, fw@...len.de,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David L Stevens <david.stevens@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: mld: fix add_grhead skb_over_panic for devs
with large MTUs
On 11/05/2014 02:06 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 01:58 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> It has been reported that generating an MLD listener report on
>> devices with large MTUs (e.g. 9000) and a high number of IPv6
>> addresses can trigger a skb_over_panic():
>>
[...]
>>
>> Reported-by: lw1a2.jing@...il.com
>> Fixes: 72e09ad107e7 ("ipv6: avoid high order allocations")
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Cc: David L Stevens <david.stevens@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> In skb_nofrag_tailroom(), we could actually omit the !skb->dev check,
>> but I leave that rather as a possible cleanup item for net-next.
Thanks for your feedback!
> Hmm... we have a proliferation of such things.
>
> Could you take a look at sk_stream_alloc_skb(), skb->reserved_tailroom,
> and skb_availroom() ?
Ok, here would be a proposal based on skb_availroom():
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/406959/
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists