[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545BC5F4.9070501@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:03:16 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, ying.xue@...driver.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dcbnl : Fix lock initialization
On 11/06/2014 10:09 AM, Anish Bhatt wrote:
> dcb_lock was being used uninitialized in dcbnl and is infact missing
> initialization code. Fixed
>
Are you trying to resolve a bug? It is initialized with
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dcb_lock);
and if you follow the code far enough you get to this in
spinlock_types.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
# define SPIN_DEBUG_INIT(lockname) \
.magic = SPINLOCK_MAGIC, \
.owner_cpu = -1, \
.owner = SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT,
#else
# define SPIN_DEBUG_INIT(lockname)
#endif
#define __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_INITIALIZER(lockname) \
{ \
.raw_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, \
SPIN_DEBUG_INIT(lockname) \
SPIN_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname) }
[...]
--
John Fastabend Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists