[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8D1F1238A24CE743B8F3CED0F137C69E408AA143@EXMB02.ahnbang.ahnlab.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:52:33 +0000
From: 박수현 <suhyun.park@...lab.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] bridge: missing null bridge device check causing null
pointer dereference (bugfix)
My appologies,
I was working on kernel 3.2.30 when I hit the crash. I only looked at the up-to-date kernel for br_handle_frame function where I still found "p->state" reference.
Please disregard my patch.
Thanks,
Su-Hyun Park
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 8:35 PM
To: 박수현
Cc: Toshiaki Makita; Stephen Hemminger; David S. Miller; bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: missing null bridge device check causing null pointer dereference (bugfix)
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 07:58 +0000, 박수현 wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Toshiaki Makita [mailto:makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp]
> >Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:07 PM
> >To: 박수현; Stephen Hemminger; David S. Miller
> >Cc: bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> >kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: missing null bridge device check causing
> >null pointer dereference (bugfix)
> >
> >On 2014/11/06 15:26, Su-Hyun Park wrote:
> >> the bridge device can be null if the bridge is being deleted while
> >> processing the packet, which causes the null pointer dereference in
> >switch statement.
> >
> >How can this happen??
> >It is guarded by rcu.
> >netdev_rx_handler_unregister() ensures rx_handler_data is non NULL.
> >
>
> The RCU protect rx_handler_data, not the bridge member port. It can be NULL according to below code.
>
Where do you find this 'below code' ?
Are you sending a patch for an old linux kernel ?
> static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) {
> struct net_bridge_port *port = rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data);
> return br_port_exists(dev) ? port : NULL; }
Actual code is :
static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device *dev) {
return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data);
}
>
> The crash happens at the below switch statement in br_handle_frame, where p is NULL.
>
> switch (p->state)
Is your tree really including the fix we already did to fix this issue ?
(commit 716ec052d2280d511e10e90ad54a86f5b5d4dcc2 )
bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of br_port_get_rcu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists