[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141110045830.GC17246@vergenet.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:58:32 +0900
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
tgraf@...g.ch, dborkman@...hat.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com, azhou@...ira.com,
ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, sfeldma@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, linville@...driver.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com,
john.ronciak@...el.com, mleitner@...hat.com, shrijeet@...il.com,
gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/10] introduce rocker switch driver with
hardware accelerated datapath api - phase 1: bridge fdb offload
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:03:40PM -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 11/09/14 22:46, Simon Horman wrote:
> >Hi Jamal, Hi Jiri,
> >
> >On a somewhat related note I am also wondering what if any progress has
> >been made regarding discussions of (and code for) the following:
> >
> >1. Exposing flow tables to user-space
> > - I realise that this is Open vSwitch specific to some extent
> > but I am in no way implying that it should be done instead of
> > non-Open vSwitch specific work.
> > - Jiri, IIRC this was part ~v2 of your earlier offload patchset
> >
>
> I dont know what Rocker crowd is doing; however, I know
> John F. has been doing some work which i have stared at
> and I was hoping to join in with Ben's effort and show tc flow
> offload on the realtek chip in my infinite spare time unles.
> (for both Linux bridge and ports).
> The priority is to merge the obvious bits first.
Merging the obvious bits first is quite fine my me.
> >2. Describing Switch Hardware
> > - I see John Fastabend moving forwards on this in his git repository
> > https://github.com/jrfastab/flow-net-next
> >
> >The way that I see things is that both of the above could be exposed via
> >netlink. And that the first at least could be backed by NDOs. As such I
> >see this work as complementary and perhaps applying on top of this
> >patchset. If I am mistaken in this regards it would be good to know :)
> >
>
> You are correct - I will let John speak on his work, but
> that is the intent.
> The challenge is there are many schools of thoughts and i am hoping
> it is not an arms race.
That is also my hope.
> >I am of course also interested to know if the above are moving forwards.
> >To be clear I am very interested in being able to use these APIs to
> >perform Open vSwitch offloads and I am very happy to help.
> >(Jamal: I'm also interested in non-Open vSwitch offloads :)
> >
>
> Hey, OVS should be able to use these APIs; i am just interested in making
> sure they are not just for OVS or OF. Then we are all happy;->
I think we are all happy :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists