netdev - Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: Ops registration for secondary encap (fou, gue)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:03:49 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	therbert@...gle.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: Ops registration for secondary encap (fou,
 gue)

From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:54:09 -0800

> Instead of calling fou and gue functions directly from ip_tunnel
> use ops for these that were previously registered. This patch adds the
> logic to add and remove encapsulation operations for ip_tunnel,
> and modified fou (and gue) to register with ip_tunnels.
> 
> This patch also addresses a circular dependency between ip_tunnel
> and fou that was causing link errors when CONFIG_NET_IP_TUNNEL=y
> and CONFIG_NET_FOU=m. References to fou an gue have been removed from
> ip_tunnel.c
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>

Applied, please in the future be explicit about the target tree by
saying "[PATCH net-next]" or similar in your Subj.

I'm pretty sure this isn't the first time I've had to ask this of
you. :-/

Thanks Tom.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html