[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7MgjOKuVY_egNz2SOWZG6X2rkFGfcaP0PiMKc_YVKAULA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:39:55 -0800
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@...eos.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] ipvlan: Initial check-in of the IPVLAN driver.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Di, 2014-11-11 at 15:12 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
>> > This driver is very similar to the macvlan driver except that it
>> > uses L3 on the frame to determine the logical interface while
>> > functioning as packet dispatcher. It inherits L2 of the master
>> > device hence the packets on wire will have the same L2 for all
>> > the packets originating from all virtual devices off of the same
>> > master device.
>>
>> Why do we need this from the beginning?
>> IOW, what problem does this solve while macvlan doesn't?
>
> I think it is good to reduce the number of mac addresses before a NIC
> switches into promisc mode.
>
Sounds like over-kill to have a new device just for not worrying about mac.
Or you mean our neigh table doesn't scale?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists