netdev - Re: [patch net-next 2/2] sched: introduce vlan action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:06:13 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Paul.Durrant@...rix.com,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 2/2] sched: introduce vlan action

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
> Cong,
> I think it is better to have all these "tunneling" activities
> as a separate action each. It is cleaner from a usability perspective.
> [e.g. it is not hard to express nat action with pedit action or take
> checksum out of nat since we have a csum action), but makes sense to
> have it separate)].
>

Sounds good.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html