[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141113213049.GA12297@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:30:49 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mikey@...ling.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
oleg@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
michael@...erman.id.au, matthew.vick@...el.com,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: Use load_acquire() and store_release() to
reduce memory barrier overhead
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com> :
[...]
> In addition the r8169 uses a rmb() however I believe it is placed incorrectly
> as I assume it supposed to be ordering descriptor reads after the check for
> ownership.
Not exactly. It's a barrier against compiler optimization from 2004.
It should not matter.
However I disagree with the change below:
> @@ -7284,11 +7280,11 @@ static int rtl_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp, u32 budget
> struct RxDesc *desc = tp->RxDescArray + entry;
> u32 status;
>
> - rmb();
> - status = le32_to_cpu(desc->opts1) & tp->opts1_mask;
> -
> + status = cpu_to_le32(load_acquire(&desc->opts1));
> if (status & DescOwn)
> break;
> +
> + status &= tp->opts1_mask;
-> tp->opts1_mask is not __le32 tainted.
Btw, should I consider the sketch above as a skeleton in my r8169 closet ?
NIC CPU0 CPU1
| CPU | NIC | CPU | CPU |
| CPU | NIC | CPU | CPU |
^ tx_dirty
[start_xmit...
| CPU | CPU | CPU | CPU |
(NIC did it's job)
[rtl_tx...
| ... | ... | NIC | NIC |
(ring update)
(tx_dirty increases)
| CPU | CPU | ??? | ??? |
tx_dirty ?
reaping about-to-be-sent
buffers on some platforms ?
...start_xmit]
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists