[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54640F23.7070509@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:53:39 +0800
From: Ming Liu <ming.liu@...driver.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<ying.xue@...driver.com>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: aesni-intel - avoid IPsec re-ordering
On 11/12/2014 07:48 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:41:28PM +0800, Ming Liu wrote:
>> On 11/12/2014 04:41 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 01:49:31PM +0800, Ming Liu wrote:
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -147,11 +149,9 @@ static void cryptd_queue_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>>>> preempt_disable();
>>>> backlog = crypto_get_backlog(&cpu_queue->queue);
>>>> req = crypto_dequeue_request(&cpu_queue->queue);
>>>> - preempt_enable();
>>>> - local_bh_enable();
>>> Everything below the local_bh_enable() should not run in atomic context
>>> as the subsequent functions may set the CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP flag.
>> If I turn off all the CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP in cryptd.c, is that
>> going to work?
> Well, this might make the cryptd function accessible in atomic context,
> but it does not solve the other problems with this approach. Also,
> cryptd can be used to move requests out of atomic context and I think
> it should stay as it is.
OK, got it. Thanks for the information.
the best,
thank you
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists