netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/4] rhashtable: Allow local locks to be used and tested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:41:37 +0000
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rhashtable: Allow local locks to be used and tested

On 11/13/14 at 06:10pm, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> This series moves mutex_is_held entirely under PROVE_LOCKING so
> there is zero foot print when we're not debugging.  More importantly
> it adds a parrent argument to mutex_is_held so that we can test
> local locks rather than global ones (e.g., per-namespace locks).

LGTM

Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html