[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415997733.15154.62.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:42:13 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com,
discuss@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fast_hash: clobber registers correctly for
inline function use
On Fr, 2014-11-14 at 11:02 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> I am wondering, compare with alternative call, how slower is just
> testing
> cpu_has_xmm4_2?
I can test, but cpu_has_xmm4_2 expands into quite some code. I don't
know if indirect function call or a test of this flag is faster. I'll
test this.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists