lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:32:26 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Ying Cai <ycai@...gle.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce SO_INCOMING_CPU

On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 15:03 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> If the kernel had an API for this, I'd be all for using it.

It would be user land code, not kernel.

Why doing a system call when you can avoid it ? ;)

Doing it in the kernel would be quite complex actually.

In userland, you can even implement this by machine learning.

For every connection you made, you get the 4-tuple and INCOMING_CPU,
then you store it in a cache.

Next time you need to connect to same remote peer, you can lookup in the
cache to find a good candidate.

It would actually be good if we could do in a single socket verb a
bind_and_connect(fd, &source, &destination)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists