[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103E010D1829E@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:37:39 +0800
From: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
To: 'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>
CC: "'chunkeey@...glemail.com'" <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
"'linville@...driver.com'" <linville@...driver.com>,
"'linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"'netdev@...r.kernel.org'" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@...ches.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:33 PM
> To: Wang, Yalin
> Cc: 'chunkeey@...glemail.com'; 'linville@...driver.com'; 'linux-
> wireless@...r.kernel.org'; 'netdev@...r.kernel.org'; 'linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
>
> On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> >
> > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
> > reversals to eliminate the array.
>
> This one is already in -next
>
> commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac
> Author: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700
>
> carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
>
> Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
>
> This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
> for bit reversals to eliminate the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
>
Got it ,
So I need wait for your another patch to be accepted.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists