[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1415984329-5569-10-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:58:49 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] netfilter: conntrack: fix race in __nf_conntrack_confirm against get_next_corpse
From: bill bonaparte <programme110@...il.com>
After removal of the central spinlock nf_conntrack_lock, in
commit 93bb0ceb75be2 ("netfilter: conntrack: remove central
spinlock nf_conntrack_lock"), it is possible to race against
get_next_corpse().
The race is against the get_next_corpse() cleanup on
the "unconfirmed" list (a per-cpu list with seperate locking),
which set the DYING bit.
Fix this race, in __nf_conntrack_confirm(), by removing the CT
from unconfirmed list before checking the DYING bit. In case
race occured, re-add the CT to the dying list.
While at this, fix coding style of the comment that has been
updated.
Fixes: 93bb0ceb75be2 ("netfilter: conntrack: remove central spinlock nf_conntrack_lock")
Reported-by: bill bonaparte <programme110@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: bill bonaparte <programme110@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 5016a69..2c69975 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -611,12 +611,16 @@ __nf_conntrack_confirm(struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
NF_CT_ASSERT(!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct));
pr_debug("Confirming conntrack %p\n", ct);
- /* We have to check the DYING flag inside the lock to prevent
- a race against nf_ct_get_next_corpse() possibly called from
- user context, else we insert an already 'dead' hash, blocking
- further use of that particular connection -JM */
+
+ /* We have to check the DYING flag after unlink to prevent
+ * a race against nf_ct_get_next_corpse() possibly called from
+ * user context, else we insert an already 'dead' hash, blocking
+ * further use of that particular connection -JM.
+ */
+ nf_ct_del_from_dying_or_unconfirmed_list(ct);
if (unlikely(nf_ct_is_dying(ct))) {
+ nf_ct_add_to_dying_list(ct);
nf_conntrack_double_unlock(hash, reply_hash);
local_bh_enable();
return NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -636,8 +640,6 @@ __nf_conntrack_confirm(struct sk_buff *skb)
zone == nf_ct_zone(nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h)))
goto out;
- nf_ct_del_from_dying_or_unconfirmed_list(ct);
-
/* Timer relative to confirmation time, not original
setting time, otherwise we'd get timer wrap in
weird delay cases. */
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists