[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416161725.17262.92.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:15:25 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pkt_sched: Fix qdisc len in qdisc_peek_dequeued() [61c9eaf9008]
- question
On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 14:04 +0100, Michal Soltys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering (probably missing some subtleties) about that particular
> patch, namely:
>
> 61c9eaf90081cbe6dc4f389e0056bff76eca19ec
>
> Why would that qlen++ change be necessary ? As far as peeked qdisc sees
> things, the packet is already deqeued and gone - so not really part of
> the queue anymore in this context (not ever requeued either). More
> advanced qdiscs such as say fq_codel - if for example they decide to
> drop head during further enqueue operation - obviously won't even
> consider the peeked packet.
peeked packet has not to be considered by qdisc : Their dequeue()
methods is called only when there is no more peeked packet.
>
> Increasing qlen from what I can see artificially shortens queue by 1.
> For some classful schedulers (say like hfsc that instantly peeks next
> packet length after dequeuing), child qdiscs will be almost all the time
> formally operating at queue size decreased by 1.
Well, the peeked packet is part of the queue, as it is not yet
transmitted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists