netdev - Re: net: xfrm: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "ipcomp_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141119101003.GL4905@mwanda>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:10:03 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: net: xfrm: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function
 call "ipcomp_free_tfms"

I have come to view you as a very clever troll.  You will say
infuriating things like "That is an interesting background information
but the function implementation update suggestion is correct" and
pretend to not see the bug for nine emails.  Then you'll say something
"Ha ha, I audited all the call trees and it can't actually be NULL so
you were getting angry for no reason."  Except you'll say it in a
more obfuscated way than that.  This is what you did last time.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html