lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:57:00 -0800 From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: Wengang <wen.gang.wang@...cle.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: clear header_ops when last slave detached (v2) On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 09:34 -0800, Cong Wang wrote: > >> I didn't look into ipoib_header_ops, thought it might have some dependency >> on symbols. > > I did look before answering and suggesting this, you really should do > the same instead of giving advices of over engineering the stack. > > Best is the enemy of the good. > > Its hard to find some networking function trivial than this one. What about other modules defining *header_ops? Don't they need to move to vmlinux as well? I still don't like this workaround even just for stable. Although definitely a real fix could be harder to backport, for me it is normal backport 8+ patches to stable: http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg66122.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg79967.html I know you disagree, I don't even want to waste time on arguing it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists