lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:48:24 +0100
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V5] virtio-net: validate features during probe

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:03:05 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:

> We currently trigger BUG when VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ
> is not set but one of features depending on it is.
> That's not a friendly way to report errors to
> hypervisors.
> Let's check, and fail probe instead.
> 
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>

> +static bool virtnet_validate_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ) &&
> +	    (VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX,
> +			     "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") ||
> +	     VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN,
> +			     "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") ||
> +	     VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE,
> +			     "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") ||
> +	     VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ, "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") ||
> +	     VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR,
> +			     "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ"))) {
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}

I still think it may make sense to print all incorrectly set bits, but
let's just fix the BUG() trigger for now.

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ