lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:42:55 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'Al Viro' <>,
	Eric Dumazet <>
CC:	David Miller <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>
Subject: RE: [RFC] situation with csum_and_copy_... API

From: Al Viro
> We would be better off with iov_iter passed to __sock_{send,recv}msg() (as
> a part of struct msghdr, instead of ->msg_iov/->msg_iovlen) and always
> advanced to match the amount of data actually picked from it.  With iovec
> behind it remaining constant.  That would work just as well as the current
> variant for sendmsg(2)/recvmsg(2)/etc., be a lot more convenient for
> kernel_{send,recv}msg() callers and would allow a lot of other fun stuff.

Callers of kernel_send/recvmsg() could easily be using a wrapper
function that creates the 'msghdr'.
When the want to send the remaining part of a buffer the old iterator
will no longer be available - just the original iov and the required offset.

So it would be useful if the iterator could be initialised to a byte
offset down the iov[].

Are there any current code paths where the iov[] is modified but
ends up being something other than 'the remaining data'?
If not then code can check whether iov[0].len has changed, and
skip the 'advance' is it has.

(I've an out-of-tree driver that assumes the iov[] isn't changed.)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists