[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416678618.20938.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:50:18 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: wc8348@...utexas.edu
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem about Setting TCP Congestion Window to a Small Constant
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 10:29 -0600, wc8348@...utexas.edu wrote:
> Hi all,
> My name is Wenzhi Cui, a graduate student working on TCP congestion
> control in Linux Kernel. I have a problem about congestion control in
> linux kernel.
>
> Recently I am playing with TCP Congestion Control Protocol by setting
> the congestion window size to a constant, say 1, and measure the TCP
> flow throughput to see the relationship between cwnd size and
> transmission rate (on a stable environment).
>
> The problem is, when I am setting the snd_cwnd to 1, the real
> transmission rate is around 25MBps. However, since I am testing TCP
> on our department network with 1Gbps (which is 125MBps) bandwidth and
> 300 micro seconds Round trip time (measured by analyzing tcpdump
> trace). So the theoretical sending rate should be
> CWND * MSS / RTT = 1 * 1460 Byte / 300 us = around 5 MBps
> which is far less than the observed 25 MBps bandwidth. I have taken a look
> at tcp_cong.c, tcp_input output.c, etc. but I still cannot find the
> problem.
>
> Can somebody help me figure out what is missing, maybe what may
> affect the real TCP transmission other than CWND or what will happen
> when CWND is set to a very small constant?
You probably did something wrong ?
tcpdump will probably show that your cwnd must be bigger than 1.
(or rtt is way smaller than 300 usec, which sounds quite big to me)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists