netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: fix mlx4_en_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1416776191.6651.58.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:56:31 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: fix mlx4_en_set_rxfh()

On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 09:05 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 18:53 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> > >  	 */
> > >  	for (i = 0; i < priv->rx_ring_num; i++) {
> > > +		if (!ring_index)
> > > +			continue;
> > 
> > Why didn't you put the whole loop under the 'if'?
> 
> To avoid adding one indentation on the block, and ease this code review.
> 
> This is hardly fast path, and compiler does the optim for us anyway.

It might have been more sensible
to use break instead of continue


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html