[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:50:28 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vxlan: Remote checksum offload
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>> Add support for remote checksum offload in VXLAN. This commandeers a
>> reserved bit to indicate that RCO is being done, and uses the low order
>> reserved eight bits of the VNI to hold the start and offset values in a
>> compressed manner.
>
> Why do you think that this is OK for you to do? It's clear that there
> is no consensus for this (and in fact there are other proposals that
> use that bit in a different way).
I asked on nvo3 list (which I believe is the appropriate forum) what
the best way to do this is but haven't gotten any response. I will ask
again-- I would assume that with an implementation and data in hand
that might be better basis for discussion.
The flag bit is currently unused in the Linux implementation, so I
don't think it can break anything as of now. I suppose we could make
RCO for VXLAN a config option and possibly change to use a different
if consensus is reached on the right approach in the future.
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists