lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuKTmQi3vK5vALbT=hseRm9mn=-cb-7hiHwg7Zbczmz_WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:39:13 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@...chenk.de>
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mdio-mux-gpio: Use GPIO descriptor interface and new
 gpiod_set_array function

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@...chenk.de> wrote:
> Convert mdio-mux-gpio to the GPIO descriptor interface and use the new
> gpiod_set_array function to set all output signals simultaneously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@...chenk.de>
> --
> This patch depends on the gpiod_set_array function, which is available in
> the linux-gpio devel tree.
>
>  drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
> index 0966951..3fdea96 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -14,13 +14,13 @@
>  #include <linux/mdio-mux.h>
>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>
> -#define DRV_VERSION "1.0"
> +#define DRV_VERSION "1.1"
>  #define DRV_DESCRIPTION "GPIO controlled MDIO bus multiplexer driver"
>
>  #define MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS 8
>
>  struct mdio_mux_gpio_state {
> -       int gpio[MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS];
> +       struct gpio_desc *gpio[MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS];
>         unsigned int num_gpios;
>         void *mux_handle;
>  };
> @@ -28,29 +28,23 @@ struct mdio_mux_gpio_state {
>  static int mdio_mux_gpio_switch_fn(int current_child, int desired_child,
>                                    void *data)
>  {
> -       int change;
> +       int values[MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS];
>         unsigned int n;
>         struct mdio_mux_gpio_state *s = data;
>
>         if (current_child == desired_child)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       change = current_child == -1 ? -1 : current_child ^ desired_child;
> -
>         for (n = 0; n < s->num_gpios; n++) {
> -               if (change & 1)
> -                       gpio_set_value_cansleep(s->gpio[n],
> -                                               (desired_child & 1) != 0);
> -               change >>= 1;
> -               desired_child >>= 1;
> +               values[n] = (desired_child >> n) & 1;
>         }
> +       gpiod_set_array_cansleep(s->num_gpios, s->gpio, values);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>  static int mdio_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -       enum of_gpio_flags f;
>         struct mdio_mux_gpio_state *s;
>         int num_gpios;
>         unsigned int n;
> @@ -70,20 +64,17 @@ static int mdio_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         s->num_gpios = num_gpios;
>
>         for (n = 0; n < num_gpios; ) {
> -               int gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(pdev->dev.of_node, n, &f);
> -               if (gpio < 0) {
> -                       r = (gpio == -ENODEV) ? -EPROBE_DEFER : gpio;
> +               struct gpio_desc *gpio = gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev,
> +                                                        "mdio-mux-gpio", n);

Doesn't this change introduce some incompatibility against the current
DT bindings? of_get_gpio_flags() looks for a "gpios" property, while
your call to gpiod_get_index() will look for "mdio-mux-gpio-gpios". It
should probably be changed to gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, n).

... or even be changed to gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, n,
GPIOD_OUT_LOW) as the calls to gpiod_get() functions are being updated
to take an initial state (both variants are currently usable but the
former one will disappear in the future). This will also allow you to
get rid of your call to gpiod_direction_output().

Side-note: it would be nice to have a gpiod_get_array() call that does
exactly what this loop does, and returns an array of gpios directly
usable by gpiod_set_array*(). And a matching gpiod_put_array() of
course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ