[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141125223643.GH3912@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:36:43 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
dborkman@...hat.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, jesse@...ira.com,
pshelar@...ira.com, azhou@...ira.com, ben@...adent.org.uk,
stephen@...workplumber.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
vyasevic@...hat.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, edumazet@...gle.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
sfeldma@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
linville@...driver.com, jasowang@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
mleitner@...hat.com, shrijeet@...il.com, bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 09/17] bridge: add API to notify bridge
driver of learned FBD on offloaded device
On 11/25/14 at 11:38am, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:28:40AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> >
> > When the swdev device learns a new mac/vlan on a port, it sends some async
> > notification to the driver and the driver installs an FDB in the device.
> > To give a holistic system view, the learned mac/vlan should be reflected
> > in the bridge's FBD table, so the user, using normal iproute2 cmds, can view
> > what is currently learned by the device. This API on the bridge driver gives
> > a way for the swdev driver to install an FBD entry in the bridge FBD table.
> > (And remove one).
> >
> > This is equivalent to the device running these cmds:
> >
> > bridge fdb [add|del] <mac> dev <dev> vid <vlan id> master
> >
> > This patch needs some extra eyeballs for review, in paricular around the
> > locking and contexts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
I like the simplicity of this. That said, given we'll have multiple
users of swdev including OVS, shouldn't this be a notifier or a
callback that depends on who is controlling the device?
> > + spin_lock(&br->hash_lock);
> (Since you asked to check locking...)
>
> Most of the other fdb_add/delete/insert/update calls take this with
> spin_lock_bh. Did you try this with lockdep enabled just to see if that
> is needed here? I suspect that anytime br->hash_lock is taken it will
> need to be with softirqs disabled from this point forward.
At least br_fdb_update() seems to be called from BH context so I would
agree and argue the lock in br_fdb_cleanup() and br_fdb_update() need a
fix too. I'll send a patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists