[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54757631.8090604@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:41:53 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@...eos.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] ipvlan: Initial check-in of the IPVLAN driver.
Hi Mahesh,
I found that deleting the last ipvlan device triggers WARN_ON() in
rtmsg_ifinfo().
ipvlan_nl_fillinfo() seems to return -EINVAL in that case.
> +static int ipvlan_nl_fillinfo(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct ipvl_dev *ipvlan = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct ipvl_port *port = ipvlan_port_get_rtnl(ipvlan->phy_dev);
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!port)
> + goto err;
> +
> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> + if (nla_put_u16(skb, IFLA_IPVLAN_MODE, port->mode))
> + goto err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + return ret;
> +}
rollback_registered_many() calls rtmsg_ifinfo() after calling ndo_uninit().
ndo_uninit() (ipvlan_uninit() -> ipvlan_port_destroy() ->
netdev_rx_handler_unregister()) sets rx_handler_data into NULL.
So, we cannot dereference "port" in ipvlan_nl_fillinfo().
Maybe "mode" should belong to struct ipvl_dev?
Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists