[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547874E2.7010200@mojatatu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:13:06 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"dborkman@...hat.com" <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"jesse@...ira.com" <jesse@...ira.com>,
"pshelar@...ira.com" <pshelar@...ira.com>,
"azhou@...ira.com" <azhou@...ira.com>,
"ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"vyasevic@...hat.com" <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"Fastabend, John R" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
"ryazanov.s.a@...il.com" <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
"buytenh@...tstofly.org" <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Aviad Raveh <aviadr@...lanox.com>,
"nbd@...nwrt.org" <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com>,
"ronye@...lanox.com" <ronye@...lanox.com>,
"simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
"alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com" <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"mleitner@...hat.com" <mleitner@...hat.com>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 04/17] net: introduce generic switch devices
support
On 11/27/14 08:50, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> $ git grep offload net
> Wouldn't it be confusing to add this another different "offload". That's
> just confusing.
>
> I still like "switch" the best. If it passes packets around, it's a
> "switch", +-. Everybody understand what's going on if you use "switch".
> If you use "offload", everybody is confused...
>
Those are all *legitimate offloads* ;->
The macvlan one looks a little creepy. Perhaps we could eventually
merge all that stuff together with this effort.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists