netdev - Re: [patch net-next v5 06/21] net: introduce generic switch devices support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5479A377.3010406@gmx.de>
Date:	Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:44:07 +0100
From:	Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net, tgraf@...g.ch, dborkman@...hat.com,
	ogerlitz@...lanox.com, jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
	azhou@...ira.com, ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, jhs@...atatu.com, sfeldma@...il.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
	linville@...driver.com, jasowang@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
	buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
	ronye@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
	mleitner@...hat.com, shrijeet@...il.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
	bcrl@...ck.org, hemal@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v5 06/21] net: introduce generic switch devices
 support

On 29.11.2014 10:59, Jiri Pirko wrote:

> 
> Lino, this was already discussed. So far there is no need to introduce
> such new infrastructure. But we have deal that once the need appears, it
> will be added (it easily can be).
> 
>>There is already an existing driver (see net/dsa) that addresses the
>>representation of switch devices. What is wrong with that?
> 
> This was already discussed as well. dsa is more of a driver for specific
> devices (has for example highly integrated mdio interface). There is
> also a deal to keep these 2 thing separated for now and try to merge
> that as much as we can in the future.
> 

I admit i did not follow the whole discussion. I was just wondering why
the existing dsa driver is not extended. But as you said it is planned
to do this in future. So thanks for your explanation.

Regards,
Lino

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html