netdev - Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: Remove BUGs on paged skb data which crosses a page boundary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141129.204323.1338545932639792456.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:43:23 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	seth.forshee@...onical.com
Cc:	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, zoltan.kiss@...aro.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, stefan.bader@...onical.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: Remove BUGs on paged skb data which
 crosses a page boundary

From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:53:50 -0600

> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:28:12PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
>> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:28:24 -0600
>> 
>> > These BUGs can be erroneously triggered by frags which refer to
>> > tail pages within a compound page. The data in these pages may
>> > overrun the hardware page while still being contained within the
>> > compound page, but since compound_order() evaluates to 0 for tail
>> > pages the assertion fails. The code already iterates through
>> > subsequent pages correctly in this scenario, so the BUGs are
>> > unnecessary and can be removed.
>> > 
>> > Fixes: f36c374782e4 ("xen/netfront: handle compound page fragments on transmit")
>> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.7+
>> > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
>> 
>> Can I get some Xen developer reviews?
> 
> Fwiw this issue was discussed previously and this was the recommended
> fix.
> 
>  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1825381
> 
> Since then I got some feedback from a tester that he didn't see any
> problems with the BUGs removed (actually replaced with a WARN so I know
> that he actually saw the condition which triggered the BUG).

That's fine, but I still want a xen-netfront developer to review and
ACK this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html