| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1412010626590.1576@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 06:28:05 +0100 (CET) From: Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com> To: Kevin Zhu <Mingying.Zhu@...iocodes.com> cc: Alex Strizhevsky <alexxst@...il.com>, Eli Britstein <Eli.Britstein@...iocodes.com>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "youtux@...il.com" <youtux@...il.com>, Midge Shaojun Tan <ShaojunMidge.Tan@...iocodes.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> Subject: Re: Is this 32-bit NCM? Sorry. I am a visually impaired person - and use a braille display to read your messages; can't have access to files that don't contain ascii-based content. Sorry Kevin. And thank you for everything. Don't worry about the lateness. It was sunday. On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Kevin Zhu wrote: ==Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:14:10 ==From: Kevin Zhu <Mingying.Zhu@...iocodes.com> ==To: Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>, Alex Strizhevsky <alexxst@...il.com> ==Cc: Eli Britstein <Eli.Britstein@...iocodes.com>, == "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, == "youtux@...il.com" <youtux@...il.com>, == Midge Shaojun Tan <ShaojunMidge.Tan@...iocodes.com>, == "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, == Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> ==Subject: Re: Is this 32-bit NCM? == ==Hi Enrico, == ==I think those packets are some interrupt status. Please check my capture by ==wireshark. == ==[IMAGE] == ==And this is a ping packet from window, which indicates it's an NCM packet. == ==[IMAGE] == ==Regards, ==Kevin ==On 11/30/2014 06:39 PM, Enrico Mioso wrote: == ==My impression guys is that this is not cdc_ncm protocol. ==Look how many short packets you can see in there. ==Without any ncm signature. ==right? == == ==On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Alex Strizhevsky wrote: == ====Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 05:22:20 ====From: Alex Strizhevsky <alexxst@...il.com> ====To: Mrkiko Rs <mrkiko.rs@...il.com> ====Cc: Eli Britstein <Eli.Britstein@...iocodes.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.or ==g, ==== "youtux@...il.com" <youtux@...il.com>, ==== Midge Shaojun Tan <ShaojunMidge.Tan@...iocodes.com>, ==== "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ==== Kevin Zhu <Mingying.Zhu@...iocodes.com>, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> ====Subject: Re: Is this 32-bit NCM? ==== ==== ====Hi Enrico, ==== ====Actually I have two dongles with different firmwares (23.128.00.00.00 & ====21.286.03.01.209). ====Probably have sent to you the USB capture with the first one. ==== ====In fact we have to make work the second one, this dongle has relevant SW. ==== ====On Nov 30, 2014 3:13 AM, "Enrico Mioso" <mrkiko.rs@...il.com> wrote: ==== Hi guys. ==== Sorry for the late our but ... I was trying to figure out ==== something new about ==== this dongle. ==== I also searched for it in my city shops without finding it ==== actually. ==== But then I came back and ... tried to look at some things. ==== ==== Alex, Kevin: in the Windows USB captures you sent me (and that I ==== sent on the ==== List), I can notiche something very strange. ==== with a shell on a computer connected to a test device I can see ==== the following: ==== at+gmr ==== 21.286.03.01.209 ==== OK ==== and so why in the Windows sniff the dongle answers to the same ==== question ==== something like ==== 23.128.00.00.00 ==== ? ==== Alex - was it the same dongle? ==== Kevin or anyone: can you use putty to interact with the dongle ==== under Windows ==== and type some commands, like: ==== at+gmr ==== and other similar commands? ==== If the dongle reports different firmware versions under Linux ==== and Windows, then ==== guys... we need to figure out the Windows switch message. ==== Overmore - in the device installation sh*t, you can see there is ==== a firmware ==== updater... Why? ==== ==== Alex: I used the ==== at^reset ==== command to get the modem back to normal state once; and so it ==== restored the ==== nvram to default or something. ==== If you reconnect it to windows ... i hope it gets re-setup as ==== before. ==== But - nothing harmful to the device, only to it's settings, ==== sorry. ==== I restored the relevant settings and it connects again, but no ==== dhcp. But - be ==== peaceful: other modems out there seems to not get dhcp anyway. ==== this is the state the modem arrives when you buy it, so windows ==== should know ==== Wwhat To Say To The Modem (TM). ==== Another thing - note that: ==== [14170.048693] cdc_ncm 1-2:1.2: GET_MAX_DATAGRAM_SIZE failed ==== ==== Any ideas, comments, suggestions are highly appreciated guys. ==== Of any type. ==== ==== Bjorn - unfortunately it seems this problem is related to E3727 ==== and E3276 ==== sticks; they can get IP from DHCP but not go ahead. ==== ==== ==== == == ==This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential material. They ==are intended solely for the use of the designated individual or entity to ==whom they are addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended ==recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution ==or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. == ==If you have received this email in error please immediately notify the ==sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message ==
Powered by blists - more mailing lists