[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKLCWa3tZu2akkJzF6nUPoS4m-mmetQYbtWiuPEN1vFGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:53:32 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: delay RTM_DELLINK notification until
after ndo_uninit()
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> On 12/01/14 at 09:54pm, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> @@ -2220,8 +2220,16 @@ static int rtnl_dump_all(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> return skb->len;
>> }
>>
>> -void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
>> - gfp_t flags)
>> +void rtmsg_ifinfo_send(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, gfp_t flags)
>> +{
>> + struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
>> +
>> + rtnl_notify(skb, net, 0, RTNLGRP_LINK, NULL, flags);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtmsg_ifinfo_send);
>> +
>> +struct sk_buff *rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev,
>> + unsigned int change, gfp_t flags, bool fill_only)
>> {
>> struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> @@ -2239,11 +2247,15 @@ void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
>> kfree_skb(skb);
>> goto errout;
>> }
>> + if (fill_only)
>> + return skb;
>> +
>> rtnl_notify(skb, net, 0, RTNLGRP_LINK, NULL, flags);
>> - return;
>> + return NULL;
>> errout:
>> if (err < 0)
>> rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_LINK, err);
>> + return NULL;
>> }
>
> I think it would be cleaner to introduce a new function, for example
> rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb() which is called from rtmsg_ifinfo(). The
> single caller that requires delayed sending can use the build skb
> function directly and then send it off.
+1
that would make patch much smaller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists