netdev - RE: [PATCH] Documentation: bindings: net: DPAA corenet binding document

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BL2PR03MB545CC342CA6A408D2FD5CF6E67A0@BL2PR03MB545.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:12:47 +0000
From:	Madalin-Cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Emilian Medve <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>,
	"Igal.Liberman@...escale.com" <Igal.Liberman@...escale.com>,
	"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Documentation: bindings: net: DPAA corenet binding
 document

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:40 AM
> On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:10 +0200, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > Add the device tree binding document for the DPAA corenet node
> > and DPAA Ethernet nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-dpaa.txt | 31
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-dpaa.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-dpaa.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-dpaa.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..822c668
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-dpaa.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > +*DPAA corenet
> > +
> > +The corenet bus containing all DPAA Ethernet nodes.
> 
> What does this have to do with corenet?
> 
The corenet-generic platform code uses this compatible. Here are some excerpts
from the platform code found in SDK arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
...
 * Corenet based SoC DS Setup
 *
 * Maintained by Kumar Gala (see MAINTAINERS for contact information)
 *
 * Copyright 2009-2011 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
...
static const struct of_device_id of_device_ids[] = {
        {
                .compatible     = "simple-bus"
        },
        {
                .compatible     = "fsl,dpaa"
        },
...
int __init corenet_gen_publish_devices(void)
{
        return of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, of_device_ids, NULL);
}
...
> > +Required property
> > + - compatible: string property.  Must include "fsl,dpaa". Can include
> > +   also "fsl,<SoC>-dpaa".
> 
> No need for the <SoC> part.  As we previously discussed, the only
> purpose of this node is backwards compatibility with the U-Boot MAC
> address fixup -- if U-Boot doesn't look for the <SoC> version, then
> don't complicate things.
> 
> Though, I can't find where U-Boot references this node.  Are you sure
> it's not using the ethernet%d aliases like everything else, in which
> case why do we need this node at all?
> 
> -Scott
> 

The initial (Freescale SDK) binding document contained those compatibles,
not sure what the initial intent was for the <SoC> variants.

The "fsl,dpaa" node is of interest to the DPAA Ethernet because it is
the parent of the "fsl,dpa-ethernet" nodes.

Madalin