[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417571879.5303.83.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:57:59 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove useless spin_lock/spin_unlock
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 09:32 +0800, Duan Jiong wrote:
> xchg is atomic, so there is no necessary to use spin_lock/spin_unlock
> to protect it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> index e1a9583..92ca907 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
> @@ -112,9 +112,7 @@ struct ipv6_txoptions *ipv6_update_options(struct sock *sk,
> }
> opt = xchg(&inet6_sk(sk)->opt, opt);
> } else {
> - spin_lock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
> opt = xchg(&inet6_sk(sk)->opt, opt);
> - spin_unlock(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
> }
> sk_dst_reset(sk);
>
Why keeping 2 copies of opt = xchg(&inet6_sk(sk)->opt, opt); then ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists