[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547F5CC2.8000908@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:56:02 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
CC: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@...el.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"fw@...len.de" <fw@...len.de>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] gso: do GSO for local skb with size bigger than MTU
Trying to "fake-out" an ICMP message to paper-over "devices" in the
"middle" of same Layer2 network having different MTUs from the ends goes
back to at least the days when people started joining FDDI networks to
Ethernet networks with bridges rather than routers. Perhaps back even
further. It had problems them (including not all traffic being IP), I
doubt today would be any different.
All devices in a Layer2 network must have the same MTU. (*)
The only exception to that which does not lead one down a rathole is
that you can have the MTU at the "edges" of the Layer 2 network be
smaller than the MTU in the "middle." And then only if the middle
"never" tries to talk itself to the edges directly.
rick jones
(*) Or at least any communicating device must be kept ignorant of what
one does to have a smaller MTU in there somewhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists