[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547EB029.5010102@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:39:37 +0800
From: Du Fan <fengyuleidian0615@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
CC: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, pshelar@...ira.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
"Du, Fan" <fan.du@...el.com>
Subject: [Discussion] About over-MTU-sized skb in virtualized env
Sorry for resend this mail, because my company email is rejected by netdev.
Hi Florian
214 static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
215 {
216 netdev_features_t features;
217 struct sk_buff *segs;
218 int ret = 0;
219
220 /* common case: locally created skb or seglen is <= mtu */
221 if (((IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FORWARDED) == 0) ||
222 skb_gso_network_seglen(skb) <= ip_skb_dst_mtu(skb))
223 return ip_finish_output2(skb);
Could you please state _concrete_ reason why locally created skb
length is _always_ fitting into MTU size? or why we needs this
checking.
Especially in below scenario:
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/figures/14/a/a/common/figures/under-the-hood-scenario-1-ovs-compute.png
As many people have discuss it in this thread:
http://marc.info/?t=141715669700004&r=1&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists