[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204163024.GG1861@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:30:24 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, tgraf@...g.ch, dborkman@...hat.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
azhou@...ira.com, ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, jhs@...atatu.com, sfeldma@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
linville@...driver.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
mleitner@...hat.com, shrijeet@...il.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
bcrl@...ck.org, hemal@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 1/6] iproute2: ipa: show switch id
Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 05:15:04PM CET, ebiederm@...ssion.com wrote:
>Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> writes:
>
>Would someone please explain to me what a switch id is?
>
>I looked in the kernel source, and I looked here and while I know
>switches I don't have a clue what a switch id is.
>
>My primary concern at this point is that you have introduced a global
>identifier that is isn't a hardware property (it certainly does not look
>like a mac address) and that is unique across network namespaces and
>thus breaks checkpoint/restart (aka CRIU).
IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID is very similar to IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID. It is
generated by the driver and ensures that there is the same switch id for
all ports belonging to the same switch chip/asic. It is up to the driver
how to implement the id. I would like to point you to driver
implementing ndo_get_phys_port_id
>
>Also what in the world does PHYS mean in IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID? Does that
>mean we can't have a purely software implementation of this interface?
>Given that we will want a software implementation at some point
>including PHYS in the name seems completely wrong.
We can remove the "PHYS", no problem. I do not understand what you say
about "software implementation". The point is to allow hw switch/ish
chips to be supported.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>> ---
>> include/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
>> ip/ipaddress.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/if_link.h b/include/linux/if_link.h
>> index 4732063..a6e2594 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/if_link.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/if_link.h
>> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ enum {
>> IFLA_CARRIER,
>> IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID,
>> IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES,
>> + IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID,
>> __IFLA_MAX
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c
>> index 4d99324..bd36a07 100644
>> --- a/ip/ipaddress.c
>> +++ b/ip/ipaddress.c
>> @@ -589,6 +589,14 @@ int print_linkinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who,
>> b1, sizeof(b1)));
>> }
>>
>> + if (tb[IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]) {
>> + SPRINT_BUF(b1);
>> + fprintf(fp, "switchid %s ",
>> + hexstring_n2a(RTA_DATA(tb[IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]),
>> + RTA_PAYLOAD(tb[IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]),
>> + b1, sizeof(b1)));
>> + }
>> +
>> if (tb[IFLA_OPERSTATE])
>> print_operstate(fp, rta_getattr_u8(tb[IFLA_OPERSTATE]));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists