[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204195439.GL1861@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:54:39 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, tgraf@...g.ch, dborkman@...hat.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
azhou@...ira.com, ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, jhs@...atatu.com, sfeldma@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
linville@...driver.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com, nbd@...nwrt.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, Neil.Jerram@...aswitch.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
mleitner@...hat.com, shrijeet@...il.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
bcrl@...ck.org, hemal@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 1/6] iproute2: ipa: show switch id
Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 08:26:14PM CET, ebiederm@...ssion.com wrote:
>Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> writes:
>
>>>So this id needs to be globally unique?
>>
>> No. It is enough to be unique within a single system. It serves for no
>> more than to find out 2 ids are same or not, no other info value.
>>
>> So when the drivers uses sane ids (like mac for example, or in case of
>> rocker an id which is passed by qemu command line), the chances of
>> collision are very very close to none (never say never).
>
>So the switch id isn't necessarily even as good as a manufacturers
>serial number that changes between different models, and anyone who uses
>this id must look at the driver to get uniqueness.
>
>Yes what is needed in the comparison to get uniqueness in a single
>system badly needs to be documented because that switch id is very much
>not enough on it's own.
>
>phys_port_id on the other hand is globally unique. So please stop
>saying that this is anything like phys_port_id.
I'm sorry. But is is the same. And the purpose is very similar. In case
of phys port id to find out if 2 netdevices share the same physical port.
In case of phys switch id to find out if 2 netdevices share the same
switch parent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists