[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1038347703.8637611.1417689901567.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 05:45:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, jasowang@...hat.com, dgibson@...hat.com,
vfalico@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
hkchu@...gle.com, wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...allels.com,
therbert@...gle.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com, xii@...gle.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
sergei shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] net: allow large number of rx queues
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:49:36PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > netif_alloc_rx_queues() uses kcalloc() to allocate memory
> > for "struct netdev_queue *_rx" array.
> > If we are doing large rx queue allocation kcalloc() might
> > fail, so this patch does a fallback to vzalloc().
> > Similar implementation is done for tx queue allocation in
> > netif_alloc_netdev_queues().
> >
> > We avoid failure of high order memory allocation
> > with the help of vzalloc(), this allows us to do large
> > rx and tx queue allocation which in turn helps us to
> > increase the number of queues in tun.
> >
> > As vmalloc() adds overhead on a critical network path,
> > __GFP_REPEAT flag is used with kzalloc() to do this fallback
> > only when really needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Gibson <dgibson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > net/core/dev.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index e916ba8..abe9560 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -6059,17 +6059,25 @@ void netif_stacked_transfer_operstate(const struct
> > net_device *rootdev,
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_stacked_transfer_operstate);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> > +static void netif_free_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + kvfree(dev->_rx);
> > +}
> > +
>
> I would just open-code this.
I will make the changes with the next version.
Thanks,
Pankaj
>
> > static int netif_alloc_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > unsigned int i, count = dev->num_rx_queues;
> > struct netdev_rx_queue *rx;
> > + size_t sz = count * sizeof(*rx);
> >
> > BUG_ON(count < 1);
> >
> > - rx = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct netdev_rx_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!rx)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > + rx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
> > + if (!rx) {
> > + rx = vzalloc(sz);
> > + if (!rx)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > dev->_rx = rx;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> > @@ -6698,9 +6706,8 @@ void free_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
> >
> > netif_free_tx_queues(dev);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> > - kfree(dev->_rx);
> > + netif_free_rx_queues(dev);
> > #endif
> > -
>
> and I think it's nicer with the empty line.
>
> > kfree(rcu_dereference_protected(dev->ingress_queue, 1));
> >
> > /* Flush device addresses */
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists