[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5481B6AA.9020502@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 05:44:10 -0800
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: sfeldma@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, bcrl@...ck.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
john.fastabend@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
linville@...driver.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, buytenh@...tstofly.org, aviadr@...lanox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
shm@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bridge: offload bridge port attributes to switch
asic if feature flag set
On 12/4/14, 11:38 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:26:40AM CET, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> This allows offloading to switch asic without having the user to set
>> any flag. And this is done in the bridge driver to rollback kernel settings
>> on hw offload failure if required in the future.
>>
>> With this, it also makes sure a notification goes out only after the
>> attributes are set both in the kernel and hw.
>> ---
>> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
>> index 9f5eb55..ce173f0 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
>> @@ -407,9 +407,21 @@ int br_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>> afspec, RTM_SETLINK);
>> }
>>
>> + if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD) &&
>> + dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_setlink) {
>> + int ret = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_setlink(dev, nlh);
> This (and I suspect other patches as well) has many issues which
> are pointed out by scripts/checkpatch.pl sctipts. For example
> here, there should be an empty line. Please run your patches by
> this script before you send them.
ack, sure thing (I usually do but forgot yesterday).
>
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>> + /* XXX Fix this in the future to rollback
>> + * kernel settings and return error
>> + */
>> + br_warn(p->br, "error offloading bridge attributes "
>> + "on port %u(%s)\n", (unsigned int) p->port_no,
>> + p->dev->name);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> if (err == 0)
>> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
>> -
>> out:
>> return err;
>> }
>> @@ -433,6 +445,19 @@ int br_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>> err = br_afspec((struct net_bridge *)netdev_priv(dev), p,
>> afspec, RTM_DELLINK);
>>
>> + if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD
>> + && dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_setlink) {
>> + int ret = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_dellink(dev, nlh);
> c&p issue, there should be check for dellink here.
>
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>> + /* XXX Fix this in the future to rollback
>> + * kernel settings and return error
>> + */
>> + br_warn(p->br, "error offloading bridge attributes "
>> + "on port %u(%s)\n", (unsigned int) p->port_no,
>> + p->dev->name);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> I agree with Scott that this code should be moved to rtnetlink.c
>
>> return err;
>> }
>> static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists