[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw46b5hCFPAwziyTRpTAzLdXeb4nrTEZXiEqxYWhRi49CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 08:35:51 -0800
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: allow setting congctl via routing table
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> This is the second part of our work and allows for setting the congestion
> control algorithm via routing table. For details, please see individual
> patches.
>
> Joint work with Florian Westphal, suggested by Hannes Frederic Sowa.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Daniel Borkmann (4):
> net: tcp: refactor reinitialization of congestion control
> net: tcp: add key management to congestion control
> net: tcp: add RTAX_CC_ALGO fib handling
> net: tcp: add per route congestion control
Very interesting. Have you tried something other than dctcp here
(e.g. westwood or lp?)
Have you considered the case where the route changes underneath
you from one device to another?
Example, here I am routing everything through eth0, where I
would want cubic, probably...
root@...esha:~/git/tinc# ip route
default via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
69.181.216.0/22 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
172.26.16.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.16.177
172.26.16.1 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
172.26.16.112 via 172.26.16.112 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
172.26.17.0/24 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
172.26.17.3 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
172.26.17.227 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
192.168.7.0/30 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.1 metric 1
192.168.7.2 via 172.26.16.112 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
And I pull the plug, and everything flips over to wlan0,
where I might want westwood (or something saner than
that. It might be nice to have a per-device cc default
algorithm...)
root@...esha:~/git/tinc# ip route
default via 172.26.17.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
69.181.216.0/22 via 172.26.17.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
172.26.16.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.16.177
172.26.16.1 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
172.26.16.112 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
172.26.17.0/24 via 172.26.17.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
172.26.17.3 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
172.26.17.227 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
192.168.7.0/30 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.1 metric 1
192.168.7.2 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
--
Dave Täht
the quest for a fq-friendly vpn with no head of line blocking continues!
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/QWPWLoGMtrm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists