netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:18:55 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn()
 in mppe_rekey()

>>> It's generally nicer to replace embedded function names
>>> with "%s: ", __func__
>>>
>>> 			pr_warn("%s: cipher_encrypt failed\n", __func__);
>>
>> Do you want that I send a third patch series for the fine-tuning of these parameters?
> 
> If you want.

Would "a committer" fix such a small source code adjustment also without a resend of
a patch series?


> I just wanted you to be aware of it for future patches.

Thanks for your tip.

Does it make sense to express such implementation details in the Linux coding
style documentation more explicitly (besides the fact that this update suggestion
was also triggered by a warning from the script "checkpatch.pl").

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html