netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCHES] iov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyh0cV+ztK47mu1QN6aF4VvPE1V5zF7_X2TdYxZ38zZRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:57:31 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHES] iov_iter.c rewrite

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:37:51AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> How about we make "kernel_read()" just clear O_DIRECT? Does that fix
>> it to just use copies?
>
> Umm...  clearing O_DIRECT on struct file that might have other references
> to it isn't nice, to put it mildly...

Yeah.

> Frankly, stopping iov_iter_get_pages() on the first page in vmalloc/module
> space looks like the sanest strategy anyway.  We'd get the same behaviour
> as we used to, and as for finit_module(2), well... put "fails if given
> an O_DIRECT descriptor" and be done with that.

If it used to fail, then by all means, just make this a failure in the
new model. I really don't want to make core infrastructure silently
just call vmalloc_to_page() to make things "work".

And if it used to do "get_user_pages_fast()" then the old code really
didn't work on vmalloc ranges anyway, since that one checks for not
just _PAGE_PRESENT but also _PAGE_USER, which won't be set on a
vmalloc() page. In fact, it should have failed on *all* kernel pages.

> Alternatively, we can really go for
>         page = is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(addr) ? vmalloc_to_page(addr)
>                                                 : virt_to_page(addr)
>         *pages++ = get_page(page);

actually, no we cannot. Thinking some more about it, that
"get_page(page)" is wrong in _all_ cases. It actually works better for
vmalloc pages than for normal 1:1 pages, since it's actually seriously
and *horrendously* wrong for the case of random kernel addresses which
may not even be refcounted to begin with.

So the whole "get_page()" thing is broken. Iterating over pages in a
KVEC is simply wrong, wrong, wrong. It needs to fail.

Iterating over a KVEC to *copy* data is ok. But no page lookup stuff
or page reference things.

The old code that apparently used "get_user_pages_fast()" was ok
almost by mistake, because it fails on all kernel pages.

                       Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html