[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208153747.GG797@gospo.home.greyhouse.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:37:47 -0500
From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sfeldma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] netlink: IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID to
IFLA_PHYS_PARENT_ID
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:17:14PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 07:02:16PM CET, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
> >There has been much discussion about proper nomenclature to use for this
> >and I would prefer parent rather than calling every forwarding element a
> >switch.
>
> Andy, I must say I really do not like just plain "parent". It is really
> not clear what it means as it can mean 1000 things.
>
> I know "switch" is not ideal but everytime anyone is talking about these
> kind of forwarding devices, they use word "switch" even if it is not
> accurate and everyone knows what they are talking about. Nobody uses
> "parent".
Well of course they are not going to use it until it's committed. ;-)
> For me this is nack for this patchset.
Thanks for the review. I am not big marketing person, so it was not
clear to me what was ideal. Due to parent already being in the code
and having as a logical description of the relationship (parent
switch/router device and sibling network interfaces -- like sibling CPU
cores on the same socket).
I do really want to collectively come up with something other than
switch for everything. Those L3 ops with 'switch' in the name will
feel really awkward....
>
> Jiri
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
> >---
> > include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 2 +-
> > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >index f7d0d2d..3d8edd8 100644
> >--- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ enum {
> > IFLA_CARRIER,
> > IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID,
> > IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES,
> >- IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID,
> >+ IFLA_PHYS_PARENT_ID,
> > __IFLA_MAX
> > };
> >
> >diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> >index 61cb7e7..1fe0a16 100644
> >--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> >+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> >@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static int rtnl_phys_switch_id_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> >- if (nla_put(skb, IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID, psid.id_len, psid.id))
> >+ if (nla_put(skb, IFLA_PHYS_PARENT_ID, psid.id_len, psid.id))
> > return -EMSGSIZE;
> >
> > return 0;
> >@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = {
> > [IFLA_NUM_RX_QUEUES] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > [IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID] = { .type = NLA_BINARY, .len = MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN },
> > [IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, /* ignored */
> >- [IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID] = { .type = NLA_BINARY, .len = MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN },
> >+ [IFLA_PHYS_PARENT_ID] = { .type = NLA_BINARY, .len = MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN },
> > };
> >
> > static const struct nla_policy ifla_info_policy[IFLA_INFO_MAX+1] = {
> >--
> >1.9.3
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists