lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:34:33 -0800
From:	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To:	thomasfherbert@...il.com
Cc:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...ronetworks.com>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVS Kernel Datapath development

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Thomas F Herbert
<thomasfherbert@...il.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> What is the impact on a developer submitting a patch. Do we now submit the
> linux datapath portion of the patch to both netdev and ovs-dev?
>
Yes, if a feature needs kernel datapath changes the feature series
should be posted on both mailing lists.


> --Tom
>
>
> On 12/8/14, 1:30 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...ronetworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/07/14 at 08:47pm, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since the beginning OVS kernel datapath development is primarily done
>>>> on external OVS repo. Now we have mostly synced upstream and external
>>>> OVS. So we have decided to change this process. New process is as
>>>> follows.
>>>>
>>>> 1. OVS feature development that involves kernel datapath should be
>>>> done on net-next tree datapath.
>>>> 2. Such feature patch series should be posted on netdev and ovs-dev
>>>> mailing list.
>>>> 3. Once review is done for entire series, kernel and OVS userspace
>>>> patches will be merged in respective repo.
>>>> 4. After the merge developer is suppose to send patches for external
>>>> kernel datapath along with old kernel compatibility code. So that we
>>>> can keep external datapath insync.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Just to be clear, by respective repo do you mean net-next/net or will
>>> you maintain a net-next branch on git.kernel.org and continue doing
>>> pull requests?
>>
>> OVS patches will directly go to net-next/net tree. I am not planning
>> on maintaining any tree on git.kernel.org.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev@...nvswitch.org
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas F. Herbert
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ