[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141209064947.GH4912@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:49:47 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] ipvs: uninitialized data with IP_VS_IPV6
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:52:15AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:39:35PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > > The app_tcp_pkt_out() function expects "*diff" to be set and ends up
> > > using uninitialized data if CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 is turned on.
> > >
> > > The same issue is there in app_tcp_pkt_in(). Thanks to Julian Anastasov
> > > for noticing that.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: fix app_tcp_pkt_in() as well. This is an old bug.
> >
> > Thanks! It will not break seqs for IPv6 control
> > connection, only that we do not support FTP yet :( I have
> > the doubt whether this should be classified as bugfix :)
> > I guess, it is a net-next material, right?
>
> Agreed, I have queued it up in ipvs-next.
> I'll send a pull request to Pablo if Dan doesn't object
> to it going there.
No objections from me.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists