[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141210141319.GA5028@salvia>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:13:19 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
brouer@...hat.com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/2] netfilter: conntrack: route cache for
forwarded connections
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:36:02PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> [ Pablo, in case you deem this too late for -next just let me know
> and I will resend once its open again ]
>
> This adds an optional forward routing cache extension for netfilter
> connection tracking.
>
> The memory cost is an additional 32 bytes per conntrack entry
> on x86_64.
>
> Unlike any other currently implemented connection tracking
> extension the rtcache has no run-time tunables, it is always active.
>
> Also, unlike other conntrack extensions, it can be built as a module,
> in this case modprobe/rmmod are used to enable/disable the cache.
I expect distributors will provide this a module. I think we should
provide features that can be enable/disable in some way, in this case
it can be modprobe/rmmod.
BTW, did you evaluate Eric's alternative? Any comment on that?
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>> + if (likely(dst))
>> + skb_dst_set_noref_force(skb, dst);
>
> Note that Hannes submitted a patch vs. net-next that removes
> skb_dst_set_noref_force().
I refreshed the nf-next tree, this patch is now there.
If the merge window remains open, I'll take the pending patches in
patchwork and send a new batch for David by tomorrow morning.
Let me know, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists