[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1442C3287A121140B690F7F20F94463D82E154@nice.asicdesigners.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:44:11 +0000
From: Karen Xie <kxie@...lsio.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@...lsio.com>,
Anish Bhatt <anish@...lsio.com>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"michaelc@...wisc.edu" <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3 1/6] cxgb4i: fix tx credit calculation
Please ignore v4, and use v5. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Xie
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:39 PM
To: 'Sergei Shtylyov'; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hariprasad S; Anish Bhatt; hch@...radead.org; James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com; michaelc@...wisc.edu; davem@...emloft.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3 1/6] cxgb4i: fix tx credit calculation
Thanks for the review comment, have sent the v4 set to incorporate your comments.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:55 AM
To: Karen Xie; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hariprasad S; Anish Bhatt; hch@...radead.org; James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com; michaelc@...wisc.edu; davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/6] cxgb4i: fix tx credit calculation
Hello.
On 12/09/2014 08:32 PM, Karen Xie wrote:
> [PATCH net v3 1/6] cxgb4i: fix tx credit calculation
> From: Karen Xie <kxie@...lsio.com>
> - Only data skbs need the wr header added while control skbs do not. Make sure they are treated differently.
> - Any credit related checking should be done before adding the wr header.
Looks like a spearate issue deserving its own patch?
> - Fixed compiler warning resulted from added cxgbi_skb_test_flag() call in is_ofld_imm().
Isn't it called cxgbi_skcb_test_flag()?
> Signed-off-by: Karen Xie <kxie@...lsio.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/libcxgbi.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
> b/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
> index 1508125..5c3f15d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
[...]
> @@ -544,15 +548,17 @@ static inline void make_tx_data_wr(struct cxgbi_sock *csk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int submode = cxgbi_skcb_ulp_mode(skb) & 3;
> unsigned int wr_ulp_mode = 0;
>
> - req = (struct fw_ofld_tx_data_wr *)__skb_push(skb, sizeof(*req));
> -
Perhaps it makes sense to store the result of is_ofld_imm() before
__skb_push() call
instead of duplicating the same call in 2 branches?
> if (is_ofld_imm(skb)) {
> + req = (struct fw_ofld_tx_data_wr *)__skb_push(skb,
> + sizeof(*req));
The continuation line should start right under 'skb' on the previous line.
> req->op_to_immdlen = htonl(FW_WR_OP(FW_OFLD_TX_DATA_WR) |
> FW_WR_COMPL(1) |
> FW_WR_IMMDLEN(dlen));
> req->flowid_len16 = htonl(FW_WR_FLOWID(csk->tid) |
> FW_WR_LEN16(credits));
> } else {
> + req = (struct fw_ofld_tx_data_wr *)__skb_push(skb,
> + sizeof(*req));
Likewise.
> req->op_to_immdlen =
> cpu_to_be32(FW_WR_OP(FW_OFLD_TX_DATA_WR) |
> FW_WR_COMPL(1) |
> @@ -597,12 +603,14 @@ static int push_tx_frames(struct cxgbi_sock
> *csk, int req_completion)
>
> skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
> if (is_ofld_imm(skb))
> - credits_needed = DIV_ROUND_UP(dlen +
> - sizeof(struct fw_ofld_tx_data_wr), 16);
> + credits_needed = DIV_ROUND_UP(dlen, 16);
> else
> - credits_needed = DIV_ROUND_UP(8*calc_tx_flits_ofld(skb)
> - + sizeof(struct fw_ofld_tx_data_wr),
> - 16);
> + credits_needed = DIV_ROUND_UP(8*calc_tx_flits_ofld(skb),
It would have been good if you added spaces around *, while at it, to keep it consistent with the general kernel coding style...
[...]
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists