netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if ndo_fdb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:32:46 -0800
From:	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Hubert Sokolowski <h.sokolowski@....edu.pl>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if
 ndo_fdb_dump is defined.

On 12/11/14, 9:06 AM, Hubert Sokolowski wrote:
> My apologies for sending again, I forgot to include a sample output you asked.
>
>> Also, if i hear your concern correctly, for bridge ports that implement
>> ndo_fdb_dump, with commit 5e6d243587990a588143b9da3974833649595587, we
>> will get two entries for each 'self' entry above.
>> Can you also paste sample output for that ?.
>>
> [root@...pixa00378825 ~]# bridge fdb show brport mac0
> 33:33:00:00:00:01 self permanent
> 33:33:00:00:00:01 self permanent
>
>
Thanks. yes, that is a problem. And, this mac0 is not a bridge port 
correct ?.

But, for the same test case, when mac0 is a bridge port, does your patch 
under review make both the entries go away for a bridge port ?.
(If i understand jamal correctly, this is his concern).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html